Pular para o conteúdo principal

Brazilian Supreme Court decided to exclude the ICMS (Tax on the Circulation of Goods and Services) of the base to calculate the Contributions for the PIS (Tax for the Social Integration Program) and COFINS (Social Financing Contribution).

Last month the Brazilian Supreme Court decided to exclude the ICMS (Tax on the Circulation of Goods and Services) of the base to calculate the Contributions for the PIS (Tax for the Social Integration Program) and COFINS (Social Financing Contribution).

The system to charge these contributions was this way:



The first impression about this judgement is the fact it is minoring the federal taxation, but if you take yourself to a next level, doing a little deep looking in the actual political scene in Brazil, the thing get some more complicated. It is not about the Supreme Court’s decision, in accordance with the Brazilian Federal Constitution, but total disrespect with the public finance.
The point is that, the government, is trying to change constitutional rights of retirement, forcing the people to work over uninterrupted 35 years. More than this, government takes the argument that the cost of retirement payments is an impossible expense to be paid by the INSS (National Institute of Social Security – or less it was to be). This is a thing to be considered, because every worker has the contributions to the social security sliced of their payments every month, also the employers. In Brazil, the people pay the employed personal quote and the employer corporate quote – corporates also contribute, and if it doesn’t, the owner can be imprisoned. 
The fact is everybody, no matter if you are a singular person or a corporate, shall pay all the 04 contributions to social security system. Is it fair? Brazilian people think “no, it is not fair”, but nobody has the power to go against the Brazilian Supreme Court, and it is because of this, we will now link these situations.
The Ministers of the Supreme Court in Brazil are indicated, not by the people, but by the President, with the support of the Congress. What? Exactly! So, if you want to reduce the tax charges, because they are being used totally in dispatch with the Federal Constitution, the “pretorium excelsum” always say “no, your claim must not be provided, government is right”. Foreigners could say “wait a moment, in this case, the Supreme Court did the opposite”. Yes, in this case the Constitution was granted, but only because the government still have the power to elevate this or other taxes.
When a new tax is created, the government uses to stablish large aliquots, but minors it by using a decree. When is convenient, it goes and re-stablish the aliquots. This mechanism grant that the tax can be freely used to increase the federal incoming. In fact, the Supreme Court gave something that can be took anytime by the government, because we are talking about money, and like Cesar said “pecunia non olet”. No matter from where the money is coming, the Brazilian government will always get all that it wants.
The Supreme Court gave Brazilians two relevant reductions on the tax charge, the “dismiss of the payroll” and the “exclusion of the ICMS from the base of PIS/COFINS”. But nowadays, Brazilian people are paying the cost, because the government is trying to eliminate the retirements, BUT WITHOUT eliminating the obligation to contribute for the Social Security System.
Sad but true, the government in Brazil is not by the people, not for the people and not to the people. The role thing gets worst, when you start thinking about the places where the role money goes. Well, if everybody is paying, why the security system does not have enough provisions to honor its obligations?
The answer is DRU! True, believe me, the answer is DRU, abbreviation of “Desvinculação de Receitas da União” (Federal Revenues Unlink). Allowed by this legal permission, the Brazilian government can catch any amount of money from the Social Security System, and use as it wishes! As well as it gets! Don’t need to be a genius to conclude that Brazilians Security Systems money is being used to health programs, education, security, and other benefits to the population. Is It not? Oh, my God! Maybe not? It is possible that we have a lot problems with corruption in Brazil, but I don’t think so… The deputies and senators, men of the people, never could do this thing…
And someone may say Brazilians don’t work as well, but let us tell you something. Let’s check the facts, and applicate some basic mathematical concepts, ok?
Most of Brazilian people, must work 8 hours a day, 40 hours a week, to own 300 dollars for the entire month. The government takes about 30 dollars, so the guy only has 270 dollars to survive until the next payment. And he must work 35 years, so could claim for retirement. It means in Brazil the people work nothing less of 35 years, being paid with less than US $ 1.80/hour.

Brazil is a great country, but is like a sheep farm managed by nasty wolves! Maybe someone should write about this metaphor… Hey! Someone did! Well, let me talk only about the Brazilian Federal Republic.


Comentários

Postagens mais visitadas deste blog

Descarga Direta nas Importações de Mercadoria a Granel

Descarga Direta nas Importações de Mercadoria a Granel A Subsecretaria de Aduana e Relações Internacionais submeteu à apreciação a Consulta Pública nº 02, de 24 de abril de 2020, que diz respeito a proposta de alteração da Instrução Normativa RFB nº   1282, de 16 de julho de 2012, que dispõe sobre a descarga direta e o despacho aduaneiro de importação de mercadoria transportada a granel. Caso venham a ser efetivadas as modificações almejadas será possível permitir que o próprio importador de mercadoria a granel possa optar pela destinação de suas mercadorias, suprimindo-se a necessidade de manifestação dos concessionários ou permissionários de recintos alfandegados para autorização da descarga direta ou armazenamento em recintos não alfandegados. Dentre os motivos apresentados para as alterações destacou-se o fato de que a capacidade de armazenamento de mercadorias a granel em recintos alfandegados nos portos brasileiros é muito pequena em relação a quantidade de

ASPECTOS RELEVANTES DA ANÁLISE SOBRE PREÇOS DE TRANSFERÊNCIA NO BRASIL

    Desde 2018 o Brasil vem desenvolvendo juntamente com a OCDE o Projeto Preços de Transferência no Brasil, com o objetivo de identificar e avaliar os pontos fortes e pontos fracos da estrutura de preços de transferência no país, para que este possa ser definitivamente alinhado aos padrões internacionais determinados pelos três principais instrumentos da OCDE, que são a Recomendação do Conselho da OCDE de 1995, a Recomendação do Conselho de 2008 sobre a atribuição de lucros a estabelecimentos permanentes e a Recomendação de Preços de Transferência BEPS de 2016.   O estudo, trazido a público pela OCDE em 03 de agosto de 2020, foi desenvolvido em 03 etapas: 1) Análise preliminar do quadro jurídico e administrativo das regras de preços de transferência no Brasil; 2) Avaliação dos pontos fortes e fracos das regras de preços de transferência e práticas administrativas existentes; 3)   Opções para alinhamento com as normas de preços de transferência internacionalmente aceitas da OCDE

IMPACTOS DO COVID-19 NA ECONOMIA GLOBAL E NO COMÉRCIO EXTERIOR DOS ESTADOS DO PARANÁ, SANTA CATARINA E RIO GRANDE DO SUL

Os prejuízos causados pela pandemia do coronavírus à economia são muito preocupantes, principalmente no que diz respeito ao comércio internacional. De acordo com estudos divulgados pela Organização Mundial do Comércio [1] , haverá uma queda entre 13% e 32% na atividade econômica em 2020. O órgão internacional acrescentou ainda que não há como prever exatamente os prejuízos, eis que a situação não tem precedentes recentes, apesar de que os especialistas acreditam que o declínio da economia global deverá superar o ocorrido na crise financeira mundial de 2008 [2] . O comércio internacional havia desacelerado no ano de 2019, mesmo antes da pandemia se concretizar, por conta de algumas tensões, tais como a disputa comercial entre os Estados Unidos e a China, a questão do Brexit na União Européia, entre outras, como as tensões causadas pelo Irã, que afetaram diretamente o mercado de petróleo e a queda nas atividades comerc