Pular para o conteúdo principal

Brazilian Supreme Court decided to exclude the ICMS (Tax on the Circulation of Goods and Services) of the base to calculate the Contributions for the PIS (Tax for the Social Integration Program) and COFINS (Social Financing Contribution).

Last month the Brazilian Supreme Court decided to exclude the ICMS (Tax on the Circulation of Goods and Services) of the base to calculate the Contributions for the PIS (Tax for the Social Integration Program) and COFINS (Social Financing Contribution).

The system to charge these contributions was this way:



The first impression about this judgement is the fact it is minoring the federal taxation, but if you take yourself to a next level, doing a little deep looking in the actual political scene in Brazil, the thing get some more complicated. It is not about the Supreme Court’s decision, in accordance with the Brazilian Federal Constitution, but total disrespect with the public finance.
The point is that, the government, is trying to change constitutional rights of retirement, forcing the people to work over uninterrupted 35 years. More than this, government takes the argument that the cost of retirement payments is an impossible expense to be paid by the INSS (National Institute of Social Security – or less it was to be). This is a thing to be considered, because every worker has the contributions to the social security sliced of their payments every month, also the employers. In Brazil, the people pay the employed personal quote and the employer corporate quote – corporates also contribute, and if it doesn’t, the owner can be imprisoned. 
The fact is everybody, no matter if you are a singular person or a corporate, shall pay all the 04 contributions to social security system. Is it fair? Brazilian people think “no, it is not fair”, but nobody has the power to go against the Brazilian Supreme Court, and it is because of this, we will now link these situations.
The Ministers of the Supreme Court in Brazil are indicated, not by the people, but by the President, with the support of the Congress. What? Exactly! So, if you want to reduce the tax charges, because they are being used totally in dispatch with the Federal Constitution, the “pretorium excelsum” always say “no, your claim must not be provided, government is right”. Foreigners could say “wait a moment, in this case, the Supreme Court did the opposite”. Yes, in this case the Constitution was granted, but only because the government still have the power to elevate this or other taxes.
When a new tax is created, the government uses to stablish large aliquots, but minors it by using a decree. When is convenient, it goes and re-stablish the aliquots. This mechanism grant that the tax can be freely used to increase the federal incoming. In fact, the Supreme Court gave something that can be took anytime by the government, because we are talking about money, and like Cesar said “pecunia non olet”. No matter from where the money is coming, the Brazilian government will always get all that it wants.
The Supreme Court gave Brazilians two relevant reductions on the tax charge, the “dismiss of the payroll” and the “exclusion of the ICMS from the base of PIS/COFINS”. But nowadays, Brazilian people are paying the cost, because the government is trying to eliminate the retirements, BUT WITHOUT eliminating the obligation to contribute for the Social Security System.
Sad but true, the government in Brazil is not by the people, not for the people and not to the people. The role thing gets worst, when you start thinking about the places where the role money goes. Well, if everybody is paying, why the security system does not have enough provisions to honor its obligations?
The answer is DRU! True, believe me, the answer is DRU, abbreviation of “Desvinculação de Receitas da União” (Federal Revenues Unlink). Allowed by this legal permission, the Brazilian government can catch any amount of money from the Social Security System, and use as it wishes! As well as it gets! Don’t need to be a genius to conclude that Brazilians Security Systems money is being used to health programs, education, security, and other benefits to the population. Is It not? Oh, my God! Maybe not? It is possible that we have a lot problems with corruption in Brazil, but I don’t think so… The deputies and senators, men of the people, never could do this thing…
And someone may say Brazilians don’t work as well, but let us tell you something. Let’s check the facts, and applicate some basic mathematical concepts, ok?
Most of Brazilian people, must work 8 hours a day, 40 hours a week, to own 300 dollars for the entire month. The government takes about 30 dollars, so the guy only has 270 dollars to survive until the next payment. And he must work 35 years, so could claim for retirement. It means in Brazil the people work nothing less of 35 years, being paid with less than US $ 1.80/hour.

Brazil is a great country, but is like a sheep farm managed by nasty wolves! Maybe someone should write about this metaphor… Hey! Someone did! Well, let me talk only about the Brazilian Federal Republic.


Comentários

Postagens mais visitadas deste blog

SOBRE A CIRCUNVENÇÃO

A circunvenção, em inglês denominada “circumvention”, consiste na compra de produtos de um país, quando, na verdade, foram produzidos em outro, que está sofrendo aplicação de medida antidumping. Esta operação é considerada prática comercial desleal, desde que, usada para burlar sanções prévias aplicadas ao país de origem do produto. A legislação brasileira prevê a aplicação de medidas anticircunvenção, que nada mais é do que a extensão das medidas antidumping, quando também se verifica que, após sua aplicação, ocorre a importação do produto objeto das medidas, obtendo-se vantagem indevida. Nos termos do que dispõe o artigo 121 do Decreto 8.058, de 26 de julho de 2013, conforme abaixo descrito: Art. 121.   A aplicação de uma medida antidumping poderá ser estendida, por meio de uma revisão anticircunvenção amparada por esta Subseção, a importações de: I - partes, peças ou componentes originários ou procedentes do país sujeito a medida antidumping, destinadas...

IMPACTOS DO COVID-19 NA ECONOMIA GLOBAL E NO COMÉRCIO EXTERIOR DOS ESTADOS DO PARANÁ, SANTA CATARINA E RIO GRANDE DO SUL

Os prejuízos causados pela pandemia do coronavírus à economia são muito preocupantes, principalmente no que diz respeito ao comércio internacional. De acordo com estudos divulgados pela Organização Mundial do Comércio [1] , haverá uma queda entre 13% e 32% na atividade econômica em 2020. O órgão internacional acrescentou ainda que não há como prever exatamente os prejuízos, eis que a situação não tem precedentes recentes, apesar de que os especialistas acreditam que o declínio da economia global deverá superar o ocorrido na crise financeira mundial de 2008 [2] . O comércio internacional havia desacelerado no ano de 2019, mesmo antes da pandemia se concretizar, por conta de algumas tensões, tais como a disputa comercial entre os Estados Unidos e a China, a questão do Brexit na União Européia, entre outras, como as tensões causadas pelo Irã, que afetaram diretamente o mercado de petróleo e a queda nas atividades comerc...

CORONAVÍRUS INFECTA O COMÉRCIO EXTERIOR

Uma grande preocupação para os agentes intervenientes no comércio exterior é, atualmente, a propagação e a contaminação pelo Covid – 19, popularmente chamado de Coronavírus. O alerta foi feito à Organização Mundial de Saúde foi realizado no final de dezembro de 2019, quando foram detectados vários casos de pneumonia na Cidade de Wuhan, província de Hubei, na China. No início de janeiro de 2020 as autoridades sanitárias chinesas constataram que se tratava de um novo tipo de vírus, da   espécie Coronavírus. Como era de se esperar, num mundo conectado e globalizado, não demorou para a epidemia local se tornar uma pandemia. De acordo com a notícia [1] publicada no site do jornal “Estadão” o Coronavírus está presente em 50 (cinquenta) países e já soma 2.858 (duas mil, oitocentos e cinquenta e oito) mortes e mais de 83.000 (oitenta e três mil) infectados, conforme divulgação feita pela Organização Mundial de Saúde. De acordo com o Ministério da Saúde [2] , o Brasil está moni...